- Admit you have a problem with dependency on Carrier Squelch and that you are powerless to stop yourself or force yourself to use CTCSS.
- Believe that a better understanding of the RF world via a Higher Power (Physics) will restore your sanity.
- Make a decision to turn your life over to your knowledge of RF principals to rebuild your life in a positive way without the addiction to Carrier Squelch.
- Make a searching and fearless inventory of your RF knowledge.
- Admit to your ham buddies that you don't understand why Carrier Squelch is bad or understand RF's physical unbreakable rules.
- Be entirely ready to allow Physics to show you the way and accept that RF acts in specific ways.
- Humbly ask someone to explain the basics of CTCSS to you and if you're ready -- DCS.
- Make a list of all you've harmed with your use of Carrier Squelch and be willing to make amends with all.
- Make amends with all of your fellow hams you've hurt by calling them with your CTCSS board turned on, except where to do so would injure them or others.
- Continue to take personal inventory and when caught using Carrier Squelch, admit it, while continuing to recognize your progress toward recovery.
- Meditate on the Physical properties of RF daily and hum the beautiful low tones of CTCSS to yourself.
- Having had a spiritual awakening as a result of these Steps, carry the CTCSS message to others to experience the power of 1970's technology and practice the use of good technology in all your affairs.
"I will tell you that a commander without the proper command and control assets commands nothing except his desk. You must have the ability to communicate with the forces under your command." General Ronald R. Fogleman Chief of Staff; United States Air Force.
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
A 12 Step Program for those addicted to Carrier Squelch
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Brains of Steel
"Louisiana lost this project [the steel mill ] because it continues to ignore its fundamental problems—the perception of questionable governmental ethics, substandard public education, a lack of investment in higher education, an anti-business attitude at the Capitol and a transportation network that’s crumbling and ill-conceived." - 5/22/07 Business Report
http://www.businessreport.com/news/2007/may/22/brains-steel/
http://www.businessreport.com/news/2007/may/22/brains-steel/
Monday, May 21, 2007
DirecTV and BPL
DirecTV Group may test delivering high-speed Internet service through power lines. Currently no one has been able to use BPL to send multiple TV signals to multiple customers.
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1433448320070514?feedType=RSS&rpc=22
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1433448320070514?feedType=RSS&rpc=22
Saturday, May 5, 2007
MOTOROLA SUSPENDS POWERLINE LV BPL DEVELOPMENT
Less than two years after announcing its Powerline LV Access BPL product, Motorola has decided to suspend product development and to devote its resources to more promising markets, industry sources say. Motorola reportedly has decided to focus on a product called Powerline MU, which is for use within multiple-unit dwellings. The decision to stop work on its Access BPL product reflects declining interest in residential broadband service delivery among utilities coupled with more immediate demand for in-building BPL systems. Motorola has indicated that it's not scrapping Powerline LV altogether, however.
Powerline LV united Motorola's Canopy wireless broadband Internet platform with enhanced ham band-notching HomePlug technology, drastically reducing BPL interference potential by restricting the application of high-frequency RF to the low-voltage side of the power transformers serving customers'
homes, not the medium-voltage wires that line many residential streets. As a result, Powerline LV avoided the system architecture that poses the greatest risk of BPL interference to radio communication -- radiation from the medium-voltage power lines.
ARRL Chief Executive Officer David Sumner, K1ZZ, expressed appreciation for Motorola's approach to the thorny issue of radio interference from BPL systems. In an effort to minimize interference, particularly to the Amateur Radio bands, Motorola designed its Powerline LV system in close cooperation with the League's technical staff, Sumner noted. A test stand Access BPL system was in operation briefly at ARRL Headquarters. Measurements and subjective listening tests on the ham bands showed that Powerline LV was Amateur Radio-friendly.
"As one would expect from a company with such a distinguished record in the field of radio communication, Motorola acknowledged at the outset the seriousness of the interference problem," he said. "Motorola's system architecture influenced other vendors, raised industry awareness of the interference issue, and demonstrated the value of working with the ARRL to find positive solutions."
==>The ARRL Letter, Vol 26, No 18 (May 4, 2007)
Powerline LV united Motorola's Canopy wireless broadband Internet platform with enhanced ham band-notching HomePlug technology, drastically reducing BPL interference potential by restricting the application of high-frequency RF to the low-voltage side of the power transformers serving customers'
homes, not the medium-voltage wires that line many residential streets. As a result, Powerline LV avoided the system architecture that poses the greatest risk of BPL interference to radio communication -- radiation from the medium-voltage power lines.
ARRL Chief Executive Officer David Sumner, K1ZZ, expressed appreciation for Motorola's approach to the thorny issue of radio interference from BPL systems. In an effort to minimize interference, particularly to the Amateur Radio bands, Motorola designed its Powerline LV system in close cooperation with the League's technical staff, Sumner noted. A test stand Access BPL system was in operation briefly at ARRL Headquarters. Measurements and subjective listening tests on the ham bands showed that Powerline LV was Amateur Radio-friendly.
"As one would expect from a company with such a distinguished record in the field of radio communication, Motorola acknowledged at the outset the seriousness of the interference problem," he said. "Motorola's system architecture influenced other vendors, raised industry awareness of the interference issue, and demonstrated the value of working with the ARRL to find positive solutions."
==>The ARRL Letter, Vol 26, No 18 (May 4, 2007)